How To Study For Law School Exams

-

Spaced repetition and study techniques are effective methods for studying for law school exams. Here's how you can apply these techniques: 



Spaced repetition: This method involves spacing out your study sessions over time to help improve long-term retention of information. Start by reviewing the material shortly after your class, then again a few days later, and then again a week later. Repeat this pattern until the exam.




Evidence-based study: This approach involves actively seeking out and evaluating the evidence that supports your understanding of the law. When reading cases, make note of the key facts and holdings, and then analyze the reasoning behind the court's decision. Try to identify patterns in the law and look for connections between different cases and legal concepts.

 

Practice applying the law: One of the best ways to prepare for law school exams is to practice applying the law to hypothetical scenarios. Try working through practice problems and essay questions, and seek feedback from classmates or professors to help improve your understanding of the law.

 

Active learning: Try to engage with the material in a variety of ways, such as through classroom discussions, group study sessions, or mock exams. This will help you retain information better and deepen your understanding of the law.

Manage your time effectively: Law school exams often cover a lot of material, so it's important to manage your time effectively. Make a study schedule that takes into account the amount of material you need to cover, and allocate enough time for review and practice.

Get adequate sleep: It's important to get enough sleep to perform well on exams. Try to establish a consistent sleep schedule and avoid cramming or all-nighters, as they can negatively impact your performance.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

2023 Bar Questions for Labor Law and Social Legislation (Day 2 - Afternoon Exams)

-
Image
Question No. 1: As an incentive for Filipino nurses to remain or be employed in the Philippines, the "Ang Nars Incentives Act of 2023" was approved by the President. The law allows children of any nurse to be enrolled in any private tertiary institution without need of taking any entrance examination provided the child maintains the required passing average grade each year. A 70% tuition waiver for each child. shall be extended by the institution and 50% of the tuition waiver may be creditable to any national taxes owed by the institution to the government. Is the law constitutional? Explain briefly. AI Answer: No, the law is unconstitutional. The Constitution of the Philippines, Article III, Section 1, states that: No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, nor shall any person be denied the equal protection of the laws. This means that all laws must be fair and just, and that they must apply to everyone equally. The Ang Nars Incent...
Read more

MNB Case Digest: Imbong vs. Ochoa

-
Image
Case Title:  James M. Imbong and Lovely-Ann C. Imbong, for themselves and on behalf of their minor children, Lucia Carlos Imbong and Bernadette Carlos Imbong and Magnificat Child Development Center, Inc., petitioners, vs. Hon. Paquito N. Ochoa, Jr., Executive Secretary, Hon. Florencio B. Abad, Secretary, Department of Budget and Management, Hon. Enrique T. Ona, Secretary, Department of Health, Hon. Armin A. Luistro, Secretary, Department of Education, Culture and Sports and Hon. Manuel A. Roxas II, Secretary, Department of Interior and Local Government, respondents. Case Citation:  G.R. No. 204819, April 8, 2014 Facts of the case: The petitioners, James M. Imbong, Lovely-Ann C. Imbong, and Magnificat Child Development Center, Inc., filed a petition for prohibition and mandamus with the Supreme Court, seeking to declare Republic Act No. 10354, also known as the Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act of 2012, as unconstitutional. The petitioners argued that the l...
Read more

MNB Case Digest: Macalintal v. Commission on Elections Court: Supreme Court of the Philippines

-
Image
Case Title:  Macalintal v. Commission on Elections Court: Supreme Court of the Philippines Facts of the case: • Atty. Romulo B. Macalintal (petitioner) filed a petition for certiorari and prohibition against the Commission on Elections (COMELEC), Hon. Alberto Romulo (Executive Secretary), and Hon. Emilia T. Boncodin (Secretary of the Department of Budget and Management) (respondents). • The petitioner challenged the constitutionality of Republic Act No. 9189, also known as the "Overseas Absentee Voting Act of 2003," which provided for the implementation of absentee voting for qualified Filipinos abroad. • The petitioner argued that the Act violated the equal protection clause of the Constitution and sought to have it declared null and void. Legal Issue:          W hether Republic Act No. 9189 was constitutional. Held: The court upheld the constitutionality of Republic Act No. 9189. The court found that the Act did not violate the equal protection cl...
Read more